Google+

On Multitasking, Writing, and Joggling

4

March 8, 2015 by Nathaniel Tower

I have taken multitasking to a new level.

About a week ago, I accomplished a feat previously unknown to humankind. I simultaneously ran, juggled, and watched videos on YouTube. If that’s not an example of a human making the most of his/her time, then I don’t know what is.

treadmill joggling

Just how did I accomplish this feat? Pure skill and determination, I tell you. But before you dub me the greatest human alive, let’s take a step back for a second. Ever since human multitasking was “invented,” there have been skeptics who’ve claimed it’s impossible. In short, human multitasking is the apparent ability of a human to accomplish more than one task at the same time. The debate isn’t whether or not humans can do two things at once (hey, look at me texting and driving). It’s whether or not humans can do two things successfully or well at the same time (oh, shit, I just crashed).

Can Humans Really Multitask?

Computers multitask all the time. In fact, my computer is performing over a dozen processes right now without any lag in ability. But computers are programmed to do this. Humans are not.

Of course, one might argue that humans are actually always multitasking. After all, isn’t my body pumping blood and breathing and digesting and doing a bunch of other biological stuff right now?

Sure, but that’s not what anyone means when they say they’re multitasking.

The doubters aren’t wrong. Sure, I can run, juggle, and watch videos simultaneously. But am I performing all three at a peak level? Of course not. The same is true when I try to write and listen to music or write and watch TV (I’ve yet to try writing while running or juggling, but someday I will).

Here’s the thing: when I run and juggle (more commonly referred to as joggling), I don’t do either one as well as I can. It’s much harder to run fast while juggling. It’s much harder to perform juggling tricks while running. If I want to do tricks, I must slow down. A lot. My top-end running speed while juggling is significantly slower than my top-end running speed sans three balls flying back and forth between my hands.

But all this seems obvious. Of course you are going to run slower if your arms are doing something else. Of course you can’t juggle as well if you are also trying to move forward and not get hit by cars or fall off the treadmill. I once ran a mile while juggling and wearing a 40-pound weight vest. It shouldn’t be a surprise that I wasn’t even close to my top speed. But is this really a sign of a human’s inability to multitask?

Yes and no. Every additional activity we add to the mix—whether physical obstacles or external stimuli—will have one of two effects:

1. The additional activities will become secondary.

2. The performance of all activities will suffer.

Multitasking And Writing

Let’s get away from joggling for a minute and explore writing. As a writer, I rarely choose to sit in a quiet room and just write. I much prefer to listen to music as I craft my brilliant prose. But here’s the thing: I’m not really doing both at the same time.

Allow me to explain. I’m a bit of an audiophile. I can listen to music while I write, but I can’t be an audiophile while I write. It’s impossible for me to really appreciate the music as I’m trying to figure out the next part of the plot or how to craft this sentence. If I really want to hear the music, I must stop writing. In other words, the music is a background activity that I am pseudo-performing while writing. In those moments, I’m not a writer and an audiophile. I’m a writer with music in the background.

I don’t believe my writing suffers from having the music on. No, just the music-listening suffers. But that’s because I’m not really trying to do both at the same time. I’m focusing on one task. When joggling, on the other hand, I’m focusing on both tasks—keep running and keep juggling. It’s true that both of these things seem to come second nature to me—it’s not like I’m actively telling myself to keep putting one foot in front of the other while also catching and throwing those balls. But I’m not fully a runner or a juggler in those moments.

Now, I said before that writing and listening to music doesn’t hurt my performance as a writer, but that also depends on what I’m listening to and what I’m trying to accomplish as a writer. Drafting is simple. I can listen to anything while I draft. But I can’t perform quality proofreading while listening to speed metal or punk. When I really want to focus on perfecting a final draft, I turn the music off completely. I know there are limits to human multitasking.

I’ve also recently become addicted to reading while running on the treadmill. I simply place my Kindle on the control panel of the treadmill and increase the text size. This is a case where the performance of each task is probably slightly deteriorated by the combination. I can’t run quite as fast or read quite as fast (although I think my comprehension is just as good). It’s gotten to the point where running outside almost feels like a waste of time because I can’t read at the same time.

We live in a world where everyone is always trying to multitask. Parents are glued to their cellphones at the playground. It’s even uncommon for someone to watch TV without another device in hand. We’re a multi-device society, always trying to squeeze in a little more productivity. In reality, we’re just doing everything a little worse—but at least we’re doing more stuff, right?

Naturally, there are limits to what we can do as multi-taskers. You can’t write well while you’re responding to every post on Facebook. Does this mean you shouldn’t listen to music while writing? Of course not. Any such universal suggestion would be foolish. Rather, the best advice is to do what works best for you. Sage-like wisdom, huh?

If I could, I would joggle while reading. But I don’t have enough hands for it. I haven’t figured out how to turn pages while juggling, and I’m not aware of a voice-activated app for Kindle that turns pages for you (surely there must be one). Besides, adding yet another activity that requires high capacity into the mix might not be in my best interest. After all, you can be really mediocre at a lot of things or really good at just a few things. I’d imagine reading while joggling on a treadmill would be a good way to end up with all my flesh ripped off.

Are you a multi-tasker? Share your experience in the comments.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “On Multitasking, Writing, and Joggling

  1. I had heard others listening to music while writing, even setting up music programs to match the mood of what they were working on. It sounded good, but I knew I could only focus on one word track at a time, so I opted to try writing to classical music.

    It was as if someone stood next to me reciting really good poetry. There was just no way I could concentrate on the story. There may be something to the idea of music being a second language. I can’t process two at once. Writing, for me, is best done in silence.

    There is an exception. If I’m scribbling at the coffeehouse where my writing group meets, it is not so hard for me to tune out the chatter of voices and the sound of old ’80’s music playing. Just don’t ask me to name the songs that were played or recount any details from the conversations. It’s hard to follow two things, so most of the time I don’t even try. The writing is more important and I want it to give it my full attention.

    • Elizabeth, thank you for sharing your experience. I’ve heard it both ways. Some writers insist on complete silence; other writers go crazy without some kind of noise. When I’m drafting, I personally find the words flow better when I have music playing. For revisions and editing though, the music either has to be off or just be something soft that isn’t distracting at all.

      The most important thing is to follow what works for you.

  2. Harpwriter says:

    After hearing some people write to music, programming it to fit the mood of their story, I gave it a try, using classical music. I can do things like painting and embroidery to popular music but reasoned that when using words as my art form, music with lyrics would be too distracting.

    It turned out the music itself was a distraction. I shut it off and opted to write in silence, concluding that symphonies are processed in the same part of my mind as literature.

    My own ability to multitask depends on how I combine activities. I enjoy music while working out and often get my best writing ideas while doing mindless tasks like housework. I think a lot of creativity results in the imagination working overtime while the body is doing something on automatic. But the key word in there is automatic. If the task was truly demanding, I need to give it my full attention or it won’t turn out well.

  3. Howard Creek says:

    I have that shirt! And 2 treadmills! But no kindle. And I can’t juggle. I am going to try to sing while running with one foot on each treadmill. audiophile – i looked that word up some time ago; I meant someone who merely listens to music and knows music. Didn’t seem like the definition exactly fit. What is your definition/meaning?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: