As writers, we tend to get pretty excited at the prospect of publication. Oftentimes, an acceptance is such a relief that we’ll take it no matter what. However, sometimes an acceptance isn’t in our best interest. We have to step back from the excitement and look at the fine print to make sure we aren’t giving away something we don’t want to lose.
Another writer recently told me his story had been accepted for publication, but he wasn’t sure about the terms. The publisher was offering him $25 to publish the story. In exchange, they would have all rights to the work. The writer was justifiably concerned. Did all rights mean the publisher could sell this story for a hundred-thousand-dollar movie deal without giving the writer a dime? Would the writer be able to use this piece in a short story collection in the future?
Not wanting to sell his soul for $25, the author asked the publisher for clarification. They never responded, so he took his piece elsewhere. The publisher in question was a pretty big name, and the story would undoubtedly get a lot of attention. However, this wasn’t enough to justify that dubious “all rights” phrase.
I commend this writer. It’s too easy to be blinded by acceptance. It’s even easier to be swayed by money. As writers, we have to be aware of what we are giving away.
Surprisingly, many publications don’t send out any type of contract or agreement to their writers when they accept a piece. This is especially true of so-called “exposure” markets (the kind that don’t pay but promise to promote your work). Some of these publications state in their submission guidelines what type of rights they are seeking. Many of the publications don’t say a word about it.
This can be a dangerous exchange, both for the writer and the publication.
As a writer, it’s important to be familiar with the different types of rights. Here’s a brief rundown of what publishers typically ask for:
- First rights
- One-time electronic rights
- Print rights
- Worldwide rights
- 6 months exclusivity, all rights reverting back to the author
- Forever rights
- Sell your soul for this publication, motherfucker
If a publisher is asking for first rights, then your story must never have been published before. Technically, that means it must never have appeared in a public venue (yes, your blog is included as public, but that secret online writing forum probably wouldn’t count).
One of the most confusing terms is the common “all rights revert back to the author.” While this sounds like a great deal, it isn’t completely true. Once you give away first rights, you can never have those back. To say you are getting “all rights” back is misleading. A more accurate description would be, “We ask for first publication rights; after publication, all other rights will revert back to the author.”
If you don’t understand the rights a publication is requesting, then you need to ask. You don’t want to assume the publisher just wants this or that. Hell, a publisher could have a disclaimer in their submissions policy that states:
By submitting, you agree to all of our policies. If we accept your work, we will make millions while you struggle to feed your family of rats in your tiny studio apartment. In many cases, we actually will also gain rights to your rats and your tiny studio apartment.
If a venue won’t tell you what rights they want—or if they don’t know—then you need to walk away. No publication credit or token payment is worth having your rights as an author violated.
Imagine if you couldn’t include your favorite short story in your forthcoming collection. Or if you couldn’t release your novel because an excerpt had been published elsewhere. Before accepting an acceptance, understand what it means for the future of your work.
What rights are you typically willing to give up, and for what price? Share your thoughts in the comments.